Friday 29 January 2016

It's about receptivity, I suppose. I don't need to say how different what I see is to what you see, what you see to what I see. Often we're trying to expand and expand and expand that perception, but there is also something to be said for contraction, for the sight that is not-seeing something, since the act of seeing will always be the act of not-seeing something else. Equally, not-seeing what another sees always was a seeing of something else, perhaps something less, but at least something unique. You see?

No comments:

Post a Comment